You are here

Biomarker Insights
Share

Biomarker Insights


Editor-in-Chief
Karen Pulford PhD, FRCPath University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Deputy Editor
Alison Banham PhD University of Oxford, Oxford, UK


eISSN: 11772719 | ISSN: 11772719 | Current volume: 11 | Current issue: 1

Biomarker Insights is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that aims to support those engaged in biomarker research. It provides the rapid communication of the latest advances in the identification of biomarkers, their application towards the discovery of new knowledge and its clinical application. The journal welcomes unsolicited article proposals. All articles are listed on PubMed and are freely available via PubMed Central.

Please visit the journal’s homepage for more information, to access full text content, and/or to submit a manuscript.

Article Processing Charges (APCs)*

There is no charge for submitting a paper to Biomarker Insights. Upon acceptance of your manuscript, you will be charged a one-time Article Processing Charge (APC). This fee covers the cost of publication and ensures that your article will be freely available. The APC for this journal is:

USD $1848

GBP £1399

Benefits of Publishing

The journal offers significant benefits to authors including:

  • International, PubMed-listed, open access journal
  • All articles made immediately freely available on PubMed Central
  • Indexed in: Web of Science Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) and Scopus
  • Fast, rigorous peer review
  • Open access format, driving high visibility and global exposure
  • Prompt online publication
  • Article metrics service to allow each author to monitor re-use of published articles

* The article processing charge (APC) is payable upon acceptance after peer review and is subject to value added tax (VAT) where applicable. If the paying author/institution is based in the European Union, to comply with European law, VAT must be added to the APC. Providing a VAT registration number will allow an institution to avoid paying this tax, except for UK institutions. Payments can be made in GBP or USD.

Biomarker Insights is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that aims to support those engaged in biomarker research. It provides the rapid communication of the latest advances in the identification of biomarkers, their application towards the discovery of new knowledge and its clinical application. The journal welcomes unsolicited article proposals. All articles are listed on PubMed and are freely available via PubMed Central.
The field of biomarkers in disease is a rapidly expanding area of exciting research. Advances in the identification of disease biomarkers, coupled with new technology platforms, offer state-of-the art approaches to improve the diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of disease. Identifying those patients who respond either positively or adversely to innovative-targeted therapy is critical to ensure that drugs are used safely and effectively. Having effective biomarkers can be the difference between success and failure in the drug development pipeline. The journal is addressed to both the scientific and medical communities and aims to accelerate the translation of biomarker research towards its clinical use and patient benefit. This is of especial relevance with the development of personalized medicine.
Biomarker Insights invites original research and review articles from across all the health sciences. Such an integrative multidisciplinary approach provides readers with the opportunity obtain up to date information from a wide array of topics in a single journal. Subjects covered include, but are not limited to:
-Identification of biomarkers (genetic, transcript, protein levels)
-Biomarker technology platforms
-Biomarker development and validation
-Biomarker pathway analysis
-Integration of biomarkers into mathematical models and algorithms
-Diagnostic biomarkers
-Predictive biomarkers
-Prognostic biomarkers
-Protein biomarkers
-Therapeutic biomarkers
-Metabolomic biomarkers
-Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic biomarkers
-Biomarkers to monitor response to therapy
-Clinical validation of biomarkers
-Biomarkers to monitor and predict disease progression and response to therapy
-Clinical validation of biomarkers
-Integration of biomarkers into clinical practice guidelines and clinical decision support systems
-Identification and use of immunotherapeutic biomarkers as therapeutic targets
-Biomarkers in stem cell research
-MicroRNA biomarkers in cancer
-Companion biomarkers
-Theranostic biomarkers

Editorial Board Member
Jeffrey L. Anderson PhD University of Utah School of Medicine, Utah, USA
Carsten Bergmann PhD Center for Human Genetics Bioscientia, Ingelheim, Germany
Jennifer Byrne PhD University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Lawrence J. Cheskin PhD, FACP John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
David Chia PhD University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
William C.S. Cho PhD Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong SAR
Christopher D. O. Cooper, DPhil, FHEA Senior Lecturer in Biological Sciences, Department of Biological Sciences and Centre for Biomarker Research, School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom.
Gautam Damera PhD Translational Medicine Medimmune LLC, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
Keith M. Giles PhD New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, USA
Urban A. Kiernan PhD ThermoFisher Scientific, Tempe, Arizona, USA
Stephen F. Kingsmore, MBChB, BAO, DSc, FRCPath Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
Virginia Byers Kraus PhD Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
Paul Lampe PhD Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
Bashir A. Lwaleed PhD, FRCPath, CBiol FSB, FIBMS University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Elizabeth J. Murphy PhD University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
Kun Ping Lu PhD Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Giovanna Roncador, PhD Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
O. John Semmes PhD Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
Dennis Sgroi MD Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
David W. Speicher PhD The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Pei Tang PhD University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
Visith Thongboonkerd PhD FRCPT Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Giorgio Treglia PhD Oncology Insitute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
Scott Turner PhD KineMed Inc., Emeryville, California, USA
Suzanne Dawn Turner University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Lorraine B. Ware MD Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Alisa G. Woods PhD MS Clarkson University, Potsdam, New York, USA
Richard C. Zangar PhD Pacific Northwest National Library, Richland, Washington, USA

Biomarker Insights Manuscript Submission Guidelines

Table of Contents:

1. Open Access
2. Article processing charge (APC)
3. What do we publish?
3.1 Aims & scope
3.2 Article types
3.3 Writing your paper
4. Editorial policies
4.1 Peer review policy
4.2 Authorship
4.3 Acknowledgements
4.4 Funding
4.5 Declaration of conflicting interests
4.6 Research ethics and patient consent
4.7 Clinical trials
4.8 Reporting guidelines
5. Publishing policies
5.1 Publication ethics
5.2 Contributor’s publishing agreement
6. Preparing your manuscript
6.1 Word processing formats
6.2 Artwork, figures and other graphics
6.3 Supplementary material
6.4 Reference style
6.5 English language editing services
7. Submitting your manuscript
7.1 How to submit your manuscript
7.2 Title, keywords and abstracts
7.3 Information required for completing your submission
7.4 Permissions
8. On acceptance and publication
8.1 SAGE Production
8.2 Online publication
8.3 Promoting your article
9. Further information  

This Journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics.

This Journal recommends that authors follow the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals formulated by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).

Please read the guidelines below then visit the journal’s submission site http://insights.sagepub.com/submit_step_1.php to upload your manuscript. Please note that manuscripts not conforming to these guidelines may be returned.

Only manuscripts of sufficient quality that meet the aims and scope of Biomarker Insights will be reviewed.

As part of the submission process you will be required to warrant that you are submitting your original work, that you have the rights in the work, that you are submitting the work for first publication in the Journal and that it is not being considered for publication elsewhere and has not already been published elsewhere, and that you have obtained and can supply all necessary permissions for the reproduction of any copyright works not owned by you.

1. Open Access

Biomarker Insights is an open access, peer-reviewed journal. Each article accepted by peer review is made freely available online immediately upon publication, is published under a Creative Commons license and will be hosted online in perpetuity. Publication costs of the journal are covered by the collection of article processing charges which are paid by the funder, institution or author of each manuscript upon acceptance. There is no charge for submitting a paper to the journal.

For general information on open access at SAGE please visit the Open Access page or view our Open Access FAQs.

2. Article processing charge (APC)

If, after peer review, your manuscript is accepted for publication, a one-time article processing charge (APC) is payable. This APC covers the cost of publication and ensures that your article will be freely available online in perpetuity under a Creative Commons license.

The article processing charge (APC) is $1,848*.

*If the paying party is based in the European Union, to comply with European law, value added tax (VAT) must be added to the APC. Providing a VAT registration number will allow an institution to be exempt from paying this tax, except for UK institutions.

3. What do we publish?

3.1 Aims & scope

Before submitting your manuscript to Biomarker Insights, please ensure you have read the Aims & Scope.

3.2 Article types

  • Case Report Case reports present interesting or unusual examples of disease, side effects, symptoms, treatments, pathogenesis, or unusual circumstances in medicine and healthcare. Articles can be accompanied by pictures if necessary—these require informed patient consent to publish—and should contribute to the existing literature on the condition they report on. Manuscripts must present out of the ordinary cases.
  • Commentary Commentaries discuss the findings, implications, and/or outcomes of specific research or wider research on a general topic. They elaborate on or offer original ideas about a specific paper or a widely-researched subject.  Commentaries differ from reviews in that they present the author’s original ideas and suggestions instead of only collating and reporting the previous research.
  • Concise Review These are similar to a review, but less elaborate and often sum up several studies in a more concise manner for easier reading and reference.
  • Debate These are published in response to another paper often presenting differing opinions.  Debates may present arguments which are not based on practical or original research. Sociological and ethical aspects of subjects can be debated, provided they are within the journal aims and scope.
  • Dedication Dedications are to colleagues or notable researchers in a specific field who have recently passed away.  Contact the editor in chief of the applicable journal prior to manuscript submission.
  • Editorial Written by the Editor-in-Chief, deputy Editor-in-Chief, Guest Editor or Associate Editor of a journal, editorials are intended to inform readers of changes concerning the journal, or to introduce supplements, special issues, or new ideas relevant to the journal.  In limited circumstances individuals other than the individuals listed here may propose an editorial topic if they wish.
  • Expert Review These are similar to a review but are invited and are generally written by an opinion leader in the area.
  • Image of Interest This submission type presents images supporting evaluation of a condition or diagnosis of an unusual case.  The image may be pathologic or radiographic, and must be of high quality and illustrative of the full spectrum of the disorder.  Your manuscript should contain a summary of the presentation, an indication of the features of the image leading to diagnosis or critical to the management of the condition.  There should also be a discussion of the disease or diagnostic or therapeutic process.  There may be no more than two figures and the word count excluding the abstract and references may be no more than 300 words.
  • Letter to the Editor Letters to the editor can be submitted on any topic relevant to the journal and are usually in response to an article published in the journal. They can suggest new subjects to be incorporated by the journal or commend and review papers published in the journal.  We recommend that individuals considering submitting a letter to the editor should contact the editor in chief first to discuss their manuscript.  Authors should be aware that letters to the editor are not always added to some databases/indexes.  Where the editor in chief determines that a letter to the editor does not require peer review a 50% discount on the journal’s standard applicable article processing fee will apply.  Otherwise the standard article processing fee will apply, except if the letter addresses an issue on a published paper typically addressed through an expression of concern or retraction; in such cases no fee will apply.
  • Meeting Report This manuscript type reports on a meeting with specific relevance to the journal it is submitted to. Meetings can be international or national conferences or institutional seminars.
  • Methodology Methodology manuscripts explain a new methodology or an improvement in existing methodologies in therapeutics techniques or medical procedures.
  • Opinion A short, opinionated response to an article published in the journal it is submitted to or elsewhere.
  • Original Research These should detail original experiments/research conducted by the authors.  Any research on any topic is accepted, provided it falls within the aims and scope of the journal.  Original research must add to scientific knowledge on the subject and must be completed in accordance with ethical principles.  Research on humans or animals must have applicable ethical approvals.
  • Perspective Typically presenting an opinion based on practical experience, these manuscripts are similar to opinion articles, but stem from personal experience of the subject discussed. They can be written in response to other papers provided the author has relevant experience.
  • Rapid Communication This is a broad-scoped category for short papers discussing a topic relevant to the journal.  Since these articles are shorter they are often able to be published in a timelier manner.  They are assigned high processing priority by the publisher.
  • Research Proposal Research proposals present outlines of proposed studies and should describe the goals, methodology and the predicted results of the research.  Research proposals may also contain the results of preliminary studies, although authors should consider presenting such results in an original research paper.
  • Review A review is a detailed examination including the benefits and drawbacks of a medicine, therapeutic technique, computer program, policy, or anything else appropriate to the journal.  They are substantially composed of a report on previous research.  Authors wishing to present original ideas in addition should choose the Commentary type.  All journals accept unsolicited review manuscripts for peer review.
  • Short Commentary A short commentary is similar to a commentary but briefer at around 1,000 words excluding references.
  • Short Report Short reports present new research that adds to previous studies. This can be reporting on the reliability or unreliability of research or informing readers of new factors that may influence the outcome of the study. Authors must acknowledge the work they build upon including any unpublished sources. Manuscripts should be no longer than approximately 1,000 words excluding references.
  • Short Review A short review is similar to a review but briefer at around 1,000 words excluding references.
  • Software or Database Review Discussing software, code, a database etc (one of the two prefixes will be excluded prior to publication).  These articles should review one of these that is likely to be useful to a number of researchers in a specific subject area. The example data used in software or database reviews should be available to readers for non-commercial purposes, and reviewers must be able to use the example anonymously.  Software or database reviews can be used to directly compare the reviewed programs with alternative options.
  • Technical Advance A broad-scoped category of manuscript reporting an advance within the journal's scope.  New procedures, experiments, standard practices, or computational methods should be presented in technical advance articles. They report on significant advancements in technology that the reader will benefit from learning about.

3.3 Writing your paper

The SAGE Author Gateway has some general advice and on how to get published, plus links to further resources.

3.3.1 Making your article discoverable

When writing up your paper, think about how you can make it discoverable. The title, keywords and abstract are key to ensuring readers find your article through search engines such as Google. For information and guidance on how best to title your article, write your abstract and select your keywords, have a look at this page on the Gateway: How to Help Readers Find Your Article Online

4. Editorial policies

4.1 Peer review policy

Following a preliminary triage to eliminate submissions unsuitable for Biomarker Insights all papers are sent out for review. The covering letter is important. To help the Editor in his preliminary evaluation, please indicate why you think the paper suitable for publication. If your paper should be considered for fast-track publication, please explain why.

The journal’s policy is to have manuscripts reviewed by two expert reviewers. Biomarker Insights utilizes a single-blind peer review process in which the reviewer’s name and information is withheld from the author. Reviewers may at their own discretion opt to reveal their names to the author in their review but our standard policy practice is for their identities to remain concealed. All manuscripts are reviewed as rapidly as possible, while maintaining rigor. Reviewers make comments to the author and recommendations to the Editor-in-Chief who then makes the final decision.

As part of the submission process you will be asked to provide the names of two peers who could be called upon to review your manuscript. Recommended reviewers should be experts in their fields and should be able to provide an objective assessment of the manuscript. Please be aware of any conflicts of interest when recommending reviewers. Examples of conflicts of interest include (but are not limited to) the below: 

  • The reviewer should have no prior knowledge of your submission
  • The reviewer should not have recently collaborated with any of the authors
  • Reviewer nominees from the same institution as any of the authors are not permitted

You will also be asked to nominate peers who you do not wish to review your manuscript (opposed reviewers).

Please note that the Editors are not obliged to invite any recommended/opposed reviewers to assess your manuscript.

The Editor or members of the Editorial Board may occasionally submit their own manuscripts for possible publication in the journal. In these cases, the peer review process will be managed by alternative members of the Board and the submitting Editor / Board member will have no involvement in the decision-making process.

4.2 Authorship

Papers should only be submitted for consideration once consent is given by all contributing authors. Those submitting papers should carefully check that all those whose work contributed to the paper are acknowledged as contributing authors. The list of authors should include all those who can legitimately claim authorship.

This is all those who:

  1. Made a substantial contribution to the concept or design of the work; or acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data,
  2. Drafted the article or revised it critically for important intellectual content,
  3. Approved the version to be published,
  4. Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content.

Authors should meet the conditions of all of the points above. Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content. When a large, multicentre group has conducted the work, the group should identify the individuals who accept direct responsibility for the manuscript. These individuals should fully meet the criteria for authorship.

Acquisition of funding, collection of data, or general supervision of the research group alone does not constitute authorship, although all contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in the Acknowledgments section. Please refer to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) authorship guidelines for more information on authorship.

4.3 Acknowledgements

All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an Acknowledgements section. Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help, or a department chair who provided only general support.

4.3.1 Writing assistance

Individuals who provided writing assistance, e.g. from a specialist communications company, do not qualify as authors and so should be included in the Acknowledgements section. Authors must disclose any writing assistance – including the individual’s name, company and level of input – and identify the entity that paid for this assistance. It is not necessary to disclose use of language polishing services.

Any acknowledgements should appear first at the end of your article prior to your Declaration of Conflicting Interests (if applicable), any notes and your References.

4.4 Funding

Biomarker Insights requires all authors to acknowledge their funding in a consistent fashion under a separate heading.  Please visit the Funding Acknowledgements page on the SAGE Journal Author Gateway to confirm the format of the acknowledgment text in the event of funding, or state that: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

4.5 Declaration of conflicting interests

It is the policy of Biomarker Insights to require a declaration of conflicting interests from all authors enabling a statement to be carried within the paginated pages of all published articles.

Please ensure that a ‘Declaration of Conflicting Interests’ statement is included at the end of your manuscript, after any acknowledgements and prior to the references. If no conflict exists, please state that ‘The Author(s) declare(s) that there is no conflict of interest’.

For guidance on conflict of interest statements, please see the ICMJE recommendations.

4.6 Research ethics and patient consent

Medical research involving human subjects must be conducted according to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.

Submitted manuscripts should conform to the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, and all papers reporting animal and/or human studies must state in the methods section that the relevant Ethics Committee or Institutional Review Board provided (or waived) approval. Please ensure that you have provided the full name and institution of the review committee, in addition to the approval number.

For research articles, authors are also required to state in the methods section whether participants provided informed consent and whether the consent was written or verbal.

Information on informed consent to report individual cases or case series should be included in the manuscript text. A statement is required regarding whether written informed consent for patient information and images to be published was provided by the patient(s) or a legally authorized representative.

Please also refer to the ICMJE Recommendations for the Protection of Research Participants

All research involving animals submitted for publication must be approved by an ethics committee with oversight of the facility in which the studies were conducted. The journal has adopted the Consensus Author Guidelines on Animal Ethics and Welfare for Veterinary Journals published by the International Association of Veterinary Editors

4.7 Clinical trials

Biomarker Insights conforms to the ICMJE requirement that clinical trials are registered in a WHO-approved public trials registry at or before the time of first patient enrolment as a condition of consideration for publication. The trial registry name and URL, and registration number must be included at the end of the abstract.

4.8 Reporting guidelines

The relevant EQUATOR Network reporting guidelines should be followed depending on the type of study. For example, all randomized controlled trials submitted for publication should include a completed CONSORT flow chart as a cited figure and the completed CONSORT checklist should be uploaded with your submission as a supplementary file. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses should include the completed PRISMA flow chart as a cited figure and the completed PRISMA checklist should be uploaded with your submission as a supplementary file. The EQUATOR wizard can help you identify the appropriate guideline.

Other resources can be found at NLM’s Research Reporting Guidelines and Initiatives.

5. Publishing policies

5.1 Publication ethics

SAGE is committed to upholding the integrity of the academic record. We encourage authors to refer to the Committee on Publication Ethics’ International Standards for Authors and view the Publication Ethics page on the SAGE Author Gateway.

5.1.1 Plagiarism

Biomarker Insights and SAGE take issues of copyright infringement, plagiarism or other breaches of best practice in publication very seriously. We seek to protect the rights of our authors and we always investigate claims of plagiarism or misuse of published articles. Equally, we seek to protect the reputation of the journal against malpractice. Submitted articles may be checked with duplication-checking software. Where an article, for example, is found to have plagiarized other work or included third-party copyright material without permission or with insufficient acknowledgement, or where the authorship of the article is contested, we reserve the right to take action including, but not limited to: publishing an erratum or corrigendum (correction); retracting the article; taking up the matter with the head of department or dean of the author's institution and/or relevant academic bodies or societies; or taking appropriate legal action.

5.1.2 Prior publication

If material has been previously published, it is not generally acceptable for publication in a SAGE journal. However, there are certain circumstances where previously published material can be considered for publication. Please refer to the guidance on the SAGE Author Gateway or if in doubt, contact the Editor at the address given below.

5.2 Contributor’s publishing agreement

Before publication SAGE requires the author as the rights holder to sign a Journal Contributor’s Publishing Agreement.  Biomarker Insights publishes manuscripts under Creative Commons licenses. The standard license for the journal is Creative Commons by Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC), which allows others to re-use the work without permission as long as the work is properly referenced and the use is non-commercial. For more information, you are advised to visit SAGE's OA licenses page. Alternative license arrangements are available, for example, to meet particular funder mandates, made at the author’s request.

6. Preparing your manuscript

6.1 Word processing formats

The preferred format for your manuscript is Word. LaTeX files are also accepted. Word and (La)Tex templates are available on the Manuscript Submission Guidelines page of our Author Gateway.

6.2 Artwork, figures and other graphics

For guidance on the preparation of illustrations, pictures and graphs in electronic format, please visit SAGE’s Manuscript Submission Guidelines  Figures supplied in color will appear in color online.

6.3 Supplementary material

This journal is able to host additional materials online (e.g. datasets, podcasts, videos, images etc) alongside the full-text of the article. These will be subjected to peer-review alongside the article.  For more information please refer to our guidelines on submitting supplementary files, which can be found within our Manuscript Submission Guidelines page.

6.4 Reference style

Biomarker Insights adheres to the AMA reference style. Please review the guidelines on AMA to ensure your manuscript conforms to this reference style.

If you use EndNote to manage references, you can download the AMA output file here.

6.5 English language editing services

Authors seeking assistance with English language editing, translation, or figure and manuscript formatting to fit the journal’s specifications should consider using SAGE Language Services. Visit SAGE Language Services on our Journal Author Gateway for further information.

7. Submitting your manuscript

7.1 How to submit your manuscript

To submit your manuscript to Biomarker Insights, follow the steps below. Please be sure to view our simple presentation requirements and ensure that references are formatted with AMA reference style. You may find it useful to keep this page open during the submission process. To do this, click here to start the submission process on a new web browser window.

Instructions for submission:

  1. Click through to the 'Submit a Paper' page
  2. On the first screen, provide your name and full contact details including email, mailing address and telephone numbers. You must also include your academic affiliations. Complete the anti-spam code and then click the orange button to continue.
  3. On the second screen, provide details on your paper. Choose the journal you wish to submit your paper to and enter the title and abstract. Click the orange button to continue to the next screen.
  4. Upload your manuscript and any associated files. At this stage please ensure you have included all the required statements and declarations and uploaded any additional supplementary files (including reporting guidelines where relevant). Please also ensure that you have obtained any necessary permisison from copyright holders for reproducing any illustrations, tables, figures or lengthy quotations previously published elsewhere. For further information including guidance on fair dealing for criticism and review, please see the Copyright Permissions page on the SAGE Author Gateway. Verify that you have read our terms and conditions: these contain important points that you must be aware of. Click the orange button again.
  5. Your submission is now complete. You will receive an email immediately confirming that our manuscript submission system has received your submissions. Please take care to read this email fully. Completion manuscript submission does not guarantee acceptance for peer review.
  6. Following submission, you will be asked to provide contact details and academic affiliations for all co-authors and identify who is to be the corresponding author. These details must match what appears on your manuscript.

7.2 Title, keywords and abstracts

Please supply a title, short title, an abstract and keywords to accompany your article. The title, keywords and abstract are key to ensuring readers find your article online through online search engines such as Google. Please refer to the information and guidance on how best to title your article, write your abstract and select your keywords by visiting the SAGE Journal Author Gateway for guidelines on How to Help Readers Find Your Article Online.

7.3 Information required for completing your submission

Provide full contact details for the corresponding author including email, mailing address and telephone numbers. Academic affiliations are required for all co-authors. These details should be presented separately to the main text of the article to facilitate anonymous peer review. You will be asked to provide contact details and academic affiliations for all co-authors via the submission system and identify who is to be the corresponding author. These details must match what appears on your manuscript. At this stage please ensure you have included all the required statements and declarations and uploaded any additional supplementary files (including reporting guidelines where relevant).

7.4 Permissions

Authors are responsible for obtaining permission from copyright holders for reproducing any illustrations, tables, figures or lengthy quotations previously published elsewhere. For further information including guidance on fair dealing for criticism and review, please visit our Frequently Asked Questions on the SAGE Journal Author Gateway.

8. On acceptance and publication

If your paper is accepted for publication after peer review, you will first be asked to complete the contributor’s publishing agreement. Once your manuscript files have been checked for SAGE Production, the corresponding author will be asked to pay the article processing charge (APC) via a payment link. Once the APC has been processed, your article will be prepared for publication and can appear online within an average of 30 days. Please note that no production work will occur on your paper until the APC has been received.

8.1 SAGE Production

Your SAGE Production Editor will keep you informed as to your article’s progress throughout the production process. Proofs will be sent by PDF to the corresponding author and should be returned promptly.  Authors are reminded to check their proofs carefully to confirm that all author information, including names, affiliations, sequence and contact details are correct, and that Funding and Conflict of Interest statements, if any, are accurate. Please note that if there are any changes to the author list at this stage all authors will be required to complete and sign a form authorizing the change.

8.2 Online publication

One of the many benefits of publishing your research in an open access journal is the speed to publication. With no page count constraints, your article will be published online in a fully citable form with a DOI number as soon as it has completed the production process. At this time it will be completely free to view and download for all.

8.3 Promoting your article

Publication is not the end of the process! You can help disseminate your paper and ensure it is as widely read and cited as possible. The SAGE Author Gateway has numerous resources to help you promote your work. Visit the Promote Your Article page on the Gateway for tips and advice. In addition, SAGE is partnered with Kudos, a free service that allows authors to explain, enrich, share, and measure the impact of their article. Find out how to maximize your article’s impact with Kudos.

9. Further information

Any correspondence, queries or additional requests for information on the Manuscript Submission process should be sent to the Biomarker Insights editorial office as follows:

Neisha Jobanputra, neisha.jobanputra@sagepub.co.uk