The purpose of the Evaluation Journal of Australasia (EJA) is to further the aims of the AES in promoting the theory, research and practice of evaluation. To do so it publishes articles of professional merit on any subject connected with evaluation, together with book reviews and example of professional practice.
The purpose of the Evaluation Journal of Australasia (known as EJA) is to further the aims of the AES in promoting the theory, research and practice of evaluation. To do so it publishes articles of professional merit on any subject connected with evaluation, together with book reviews and example of professional practice.
|Janet Clinton||University of Melbourne, Australia|
Please read the guidelines below then visit the Journal's submission site https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/evja to submit your paper. Please note that manuscripts not conforming to these guidelines may be returned.
Only manuscripts of sufficient quality that meet the aims and scope of Evaluation Journal of Australasia will be reviewed.
There are no fees payable to submit or publish in this journal.
As part of the submission process you will be required to warrant that you are submitting your original work, that you have the rights in the work, that you are submitting the work for first publication in the Journal and that it is not being considered for publication elsewhere and has not already been published elsewhere, and that you have obtained and can supply all necessary permissions for the reproduction of any copyright works not owned by you.
Before submitting your manuscript to Evaluation Journal of Australasia, please ensure you have read the Aims & Scope
An academic article is defined as one that is theory based, contributes to the literature within evaluative thinking and practice and makes a contribution to the field of evaluation. Academic articles should be between 3000-5000 words in length.
A practice article is defined as one that applies an evaluation theory, describes the evaluation and presents the findings of a program or project and disseminates practice.
Postgraduate student article
A postgraduate student article is defined as one that presents an evaluation design, describes the decision-making processes leading to the design and presents the logic model and prospective timeline for the evaluation and disseminates evaluation design.
A narrative article is defined as a story, a conscious stream of thought, or a reflection that allows the emerging Indigenous evaluator to start writing by telling their story, this could include written, oral recordings, videos, paintings or mixed media.
An opinion article is one where the author states their personal view or opinion on a topic. It may be provocative or a different point of view on a specific topic than one published elsewhere.
A book review is defined as a critical analysis or evaluation of the content, structure and purpose of a publication from the reviewer’s viewpoint. Book reviews should be between 1000-1500 words in length.
Under the title of Special Feature, authors are encouraged to write a ‘Letter to the editor’ on a specific topic or share their keynote addresses.
The Editors reserve the right to return articles to authors where they exceed word limits. Submission of a manuscript to another journal while under review by the Evaluation Journal of Australasia is unethical. Breach of this principle will result in the article being removed from consideration for publication in Evaluation Journal of Australasia. Each manuscript must be accompanied by a signed statement that it has not been published previously and that it has not and will not be sent for consideration by another journal while submitted to the Evaluation Journal of Australasia.
The SAGE Author Gateway has some general advice and on how to get published, plus links to further resources.
1.3.1 Make your article discoverable
When writing up your article, think about how you can make it discoverable. The title, keywords and abstract are key to ensuring readers find your article through search engines such as Google. For information and guidance on how best to title your article, write your abstract and select your keywords, have a look at this page on the Gateway: How to Help Readers Find Your Article Online
Evaluation Journal of Australasia operates a double-blinded peer review process in which manuscripts are reviewed anonymously by two appropriate referees. Decisions on manuscripts will be taken as rapidly as possible: the review process usually takes four to six weeks.
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used by reviewers without the express written author consent. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations formulated clearly with supporting arguments. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative or other relationships, or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the articles.
All parties who have made a substantive contribution to the article should be listed as authors. Principal authorship, authorship order, and other publication credits should be based on the relative scientific or professional contributions of the individuals involved, regardless of their status. A student is usually listed as principal author on any multiple-authored publication that substantially derives from the student’s dissertation or thesis.
All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an Acknowledgements section. Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help, or a department chair who provided only general support.
Please supply any personal acknowledgements separately to the main text to facilitate anonymous peer review.
Evaluation Journal of Australasia requires all authors to acknowledge their funding in a consistent fashion under a separate heading. Please visit the Funding Acknowledgements page on the SAGE Journal Author Gateway to confirm the format of the acknowledgment text in the event of funding, or state that: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Evaluation Journal of Australasia encourages authors to include a declaration of any conflicting interests and recommends you review the good practice guidelines on the SAGE Journal Author Gateway
SAGE is committed to upholding the integrity of the academic record. We encourage authors to refer to the Committee on Publication Ethics’ International Standards for Authors and view the Publication Ethics page on the SAGE Author Gateway
Evaluation Journal of Australasia and SAGE take issues of copyright infringement, plagiarism or other breaches of best practice in publication very seriously. We seek to protect the rights of our authors and we always investigate claims of plagiarism or misuse of published articles. Equally, we seek to protect the reputation of the journal against malpractice. Submitted articles may be checked with duplication-checking software. Where an article, for example, is found to have plagiarised other work or included third-party copyright material without permission or with insufficient acknowledgement, or where the authorship of the article is contested, we reserve the right to take action including, but not limited to: publishing an erratum or corrigendum (correction); retracting the article; taking up the matter with the head of department or dean of the author's institution and/or relevant academic bodies or societies; or taking appropriate legal action.
If material has been previously published it is not generally acceptable for publication in a SAGE journal. However, there are certain circumstances where previously published material can be considered for publication. Please refer to the guidance on the SAGE Author Gateway or if in doubt, contact the Editor at the address given below.
Before publication, SAGE requires the author as the rights holder to sign a Journal Contributor’s Publishing Agreement. SAGE’s Journal Contributor’s Publishing Agreement is an exclusive licence agreement which means that the author retains copyright in the work but grants SAGE the sole and exclusive right and licence to publish for the full legal term of copyright. Exceptions may exist where an assignment of copyright is required or preferred by a proprietor other than SAGE. In this case copyright in the work will be assigned from the author to the society. For more information please visit the SAGE Author Gateway
Evaluation Journal of Australasia offers optional open access publishing via the SAGE Choice programme. For more information please visit the SAGE Choice website. For information on funding body compliance, and depositing your article in repositories, please visit SAGE Publishing Policies on our Journal Author Gateway.
The preferred format for your manuscript is Word. LaTeX files are also accepted. Word and (La)Tex templates are available on the Manuscript Submission Guidelines page of our Author Gateway.
1. Left justified, single column, minimal formatting
2. Bold headings and identify heading levels (using a heading hierarchy) so that heading levels are distinguishable (e.g. A-level headings in block capitals + bold; B-level headings in title case + bold; C-level headings in sentence case + bold; or Heading 1, 2, 3 etc)
3. Use 10-point font size for text and single spacing
4. Check that Track Changes are not left on
5. Include figures and tables in the main article to show placement. Label figures as Figure 1, Figure 2, etc. Label tables as Table 1, Table 2, etc. Also, refer to each figure/table in the text preceding it, such as ‘... as shown in Figure 1’ or ‘Table 1 shows ...’
For guidance on the preparation of illustrations, pictures and graphs in electronic format, please visit SAGE’s Manuscript Submission Guidelines
Figures supplied in colour will appear in colour online regardless of whether or not these illustrations are reproduced in colour in the printed version. For specifically requested colour reproduction in print, you will receive information regarding the costs from SAGE after receipt of your accepted article.
This journal is able to host additional materials online (e.g. datasets, podcasts, videos, images etc) alongside the full-text of the article. For more information please refer to our guidelines on submitting supplementary files
Evaluation Journal of Australasia adheres to the APA reference style. View the APA guidelines to ensure your manuscript conforms to this reference style.
Authors seeking assistance with English language editing, translation, or figure and manuscript formatting to fit the journal’s specifications should consider using SAGE Language Services. Visit SAGE Language Services on our Journal Author Gateway for further information.
Before submitting your manuscript, please ensure you carefully read and adhere to all the guidelines and instructions to authors provided below. Manuscripts not conforming to these guidelines may be returned.
Evaluation Journal of Australasia is hosted on SAGE Track, a web based online submission and peer review system powered by ScholarOne™ Manuscripts.
Visit https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/evja to login and submit your article online.
IMPORTANT: Please check whether you already have an account in the system before trying to create a new one. If you have reviewed or authored for the journal in the past year it is likely that you will have had an account created. For further guidance on submitting your manuscript online please visit ScholarOne Online Help.
1. Manuscripts should be submitted with the name and affiliation of the author as a supplementary document title page to preserve anonymity. Please include your title, affiliations and address and contact details.
2. Articles submitted should be accompanied by an abstract, not generally exceeding 200 words, which should be confined to important findings or innovations and (where applicable) a brief identification of the research, project or activity covered in the article. Abstracts should refer only to the content of the article, and should avoid making observations about the broader subject area.
3. Articles should be submitted in MS Word format and not normally exceed a published length of 10 pages, including all tables, graphics, notes and references.
Note: Articles shorter than 3000 words will not generally be regarded as suitable for peer review.
As part of our commitment to ensuring an ethical, transparent and fair peer review process SAGE is a supporting member of ORCID, the Open Researcher and Contributor ID. ORCID provides a persistent digital identifier that distinguishes researchers from every other researcher and, through integration in key research workflows such as manuscript and grant submission, supports automated linkages between researchers and their professional activities ensuring that their work is recognised.
We encourage all authors to add their ORCIDs to their SAGE Track accounts and include their ORCIDs as part of the submission process. If you don’t already have one you can create one here
You will be asked to provide contact details and academic affiliations for all co-authors via the submission system and identify who is to be the corresponding author. These details must match what appears on your manuscript. At this stage please ensure you have included all the required statements and declarations and uploaded any additional supplementary files (including reporting guidelines where relevant).
Please also ensure that you have obtained any necessary permission from copyright holders for reproducing any illustrations, tables, figures or lengthy quotations previously published elsewhere. For further information including guidance on fair dealing for criticism and review, please see the Copyright and Permissions page on the SAGE Author Gateway
Your SAGE Production Editor will keep you informed as to your article’s progress throughout the production process. Proofs will be sent by PDF to the corresponding author and should be returned promptly. Authors are reminded to check their proofs carefully to confirm that all author information, including names, affiliations, sequence and contact details are correct, and that Funding and Conflict of Interest statements, if any, are accurate. Please note that if there are any changes to the author list at this stage all authors will be required to complete and sign a form authorising the change.
Online First allows final articles (completed and approved articles awaiting assignment to a future issue) to be published online prior to their inclusion in a journal issue, which significantly reduces the lead time between submission and publication. Visit the SAGE Journals help page for more details, including how to cite Online First articles.
SAGE provides authors with online access to their final article.
Publication is not the end of the process! You can help disseminate your article and ensure it is as widely read and cited as possible. The SAGE Author Gateway has numerous resources to help you promote your work. Visit the Promote Your Article page on the Gateway for tips and advice. In addition, SAGE is partnered with Kudos, a free service that allows authors to explain, enrich, share, and measure the impact of their article. Find out how to maximise your article’s impact with Kudos.
Any correspondence, queries or additional requests for information on the manuscript submission process should be sent to the editorial office as follows: firstname.lastname@example.org